biodiversity

Canada: The campaign to preserve Technoparc Montreal wetlands

Rose Bridger Canada , , , , , , , ,

An alliance of community and environmental organizations, led by TechnoparcOiseaux, works to protect the highly biodiverse Technoparc Montréal wetlands, north of Montreal-Trudeau Airport, from development. There is widespread support for conferring protected status to the welands through inclusion in a national urban park.

Observations map, Technoparc Wetlands
Map of citizen observations of plant and animal wildlife species at Technoparc Montréal wetlands near Montreal-Trudeau Airport. Image source: iNaturalist

Technoparc Montreal, a high-tech industrial park near Montreal-Trudeau International Airport, is situated in the most biodiverse wetlands on Montreal Island, known as the Technoparc wetlands. Many citizens’ observations of plant and animal species are recorded on the Technoparc:Montreal Wetlands section of the iNaturalist crowdsourced identification system. By March 2026, 17,929 observations of 1,302 species by 549 observers had been recorded. But there is a long history of encroaching development which has been opposed at every stage. In July 2016 conservationists urged Technoparc to reconsider development of Eco Campus Hubert Reeves, for cleantech startup companies, on an area of the wetlands containing a marsh hosting a wide variety of birds; 160 species had been spotted. Bird Protection Quebec said development on the Technoparc wetlands, ‘an oasis in the heart of Montreal’, posed threats to uniquely biodiverse wetlands and woodlands, with the number of bird species among the highest in the Montreal region and including 19 categorized as threatened. Les Amis du Parc Meadowbrook passed a resolution, endorsed by Green Coalition and Sauvons la Falaise, calling on authorities to impose an immediate moratorium on Technoparc Montreal expansion and to consolidate undeveloped areas into a protected wildlife refuge. Extension of a road into the wetlands continued despite the presence of a few least bitterns, a small species of heron thought to be at risk in the Montreal area, leading members of the Green Coalition, Sauvons la Falaise and the Green Party to hold a news conference at the site.

In March 2018 Joel Coutu, leading birders on regular walks in the wetlands drew attention to Red-shouldered hawks, merlins and other birds of prey, indicating a richly biodiverse environment and mammals including coyotes, foxes, beavers rabbits and skunks. Bird enthusiasts and environmental groups intensified pressure to preserve the wetlands in August 2018 with a petition demanding a halt to works on sensitive areas in and around the Technoparc and to protect the sites as a ‘Sources Nature Park’ conservation area attracting over 68,000 signatures. Bird species nesting on the site that activists were concerned about included four at-risk species: Least Bittern, Wood Thrush, Eastern Wood-Pewee and Barn Swallow. Tree cutting for a Réseau express métropolitain (REM) light metro station at the Technoparc began in September 2018. TechnoparcOiseaux, Trainsparence and Montreal Climate Coalition had led a legal attempt to halt the project, appealing a previous lawsuit demanding a halt to the works that had been thrown out, but the provincial government had passed a special law enabling its construction. Matthew Chapman, president of Montreal Climate Coalition, said, “The biggest project in the last half century went forward in a very undemocratic way” and that it would facilitate development eroding the area’s remaining green space. The previous month, environmentalists had noted the irony of Eco-Campus Hubert Reeves being named after a renowned ecologist and astrophysicist, as preparation of the site included removing 3,000 trees for extension of a road anout 500 meters into natural space.

In September 2021, while Covid-19 restrictions were in place, dozens of local residents gathered near the Technoparc in a demonstration organized by TechnoparcOiseaux, protesting a proposed 15,000 square meter facility for production of surgical masks on part of the wetlands called Monarch Field. Efforts to expand the Des Sources Nature Park to include the Technoparc wetlands received a setback in February 2025 when Aéroports de Montréal (ADM), operator of Montreal-Trudeau Airport, stated concerns over bird strikes in the aftermath of a 29th December 2024 air crash in South Korea in which 179 people died. Air accident investigations had concluded that bird strikes were a factor and ADM stated, “It is inconceivable to ask an airport authority to assign a nature park use to such a large land located so close to the airfield and runways, as it would increase the presence of wildlife on site.” Katherine Collin of TechnoparcOiseaux rejected this argument saying, “We believe that ADM is overstating the dangers posed by the bird population here”. John Gradek, an aviation expert, said ADM was being too cautious as it can deploy technology such as blank cannons, along with falconry, to control birdlife around the airport.

ADM said it planned to develop a “decarbonization support center” on part of the land, Lot 20, in the following 10-20 years, claiming that any development of the site would protect areas that are of high ecological value and safeguard endangered species. Its 2023-2043 master plan includes solar panels, storage for ‘fuels of the future’ and other development on the site and the adjoining Dorval golf course. TechnoparcOiseaux’s Katherine Collin said, “What we see is worse than we imagined. Development is planned over vital habitat for endangered and threatened species, there are no buffer zones planned around current conservation areas, there will be a massive loss of green space – 130 hectares.” At ADM’s May 2025 annual public meeting president and director general, Yves Beauchamp, said the primary concern was passenger safety, “So a park of this expanse, near the runways, is not compatible with the safety goals we have. So will we change our opinions? No.” Yet hopes that the federal government might select the lands north of Montreal-Trudeau Airport as a national urban park, conferring protected status on 200 hectares of green space, were raised by a letter from the minister responsible for Parks Canada, Steven Guilbeault, stating, “The federal government is open to creating a national park on those lands”. A letter to Transport Minister Steven MacKinnon from Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal (CMM) executive director Massimo Iezzoni and Montreal’s executive committee chai Émilie Thuillier stated, “Few subjects enjoy such unanimous support within the CMM as the importance of protecting the natural areas around Montreal-Trudeau International Airport” and pointed out that the CMM represents 82 municipalities and 4.3 million people, nearly 50 per cent of the population of Quebec’s population.

For more information including references for all source material, photos and videos see the case study on EJAtlas, the world’s largest, most comprehensive online database of social conflict around environmental issues – Technoparc Montreal wetlands, Quebec, Canada

Maldives ecosystems and communities threatened by aviation expansion drive

Rose Bridger mangroves, The Maldives , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A proliferation of new airport projects in the Maldives is destroying unique coastal ecosystems and threatens devastating impacts on communities and livelihoods. As many as 20 new airports, several accompanied by hotel developments, are planned and under construction, and many projects are government funded.

In October 2017 a dredger, newly acquired by Maldives Transport and Contracting Company (MTCC) and at 92 metres in length the largest in its dredging fleet, began land reclamation for a new airport on Kulhudhuffushi, an island in the north of the Maldives. By early January 2018 land reclamation for the new airport was complete. Sediment dredged up from the ocean bed had been dumped on the largest white clay wetland and mangrove in the Maldives and destroyed a unique ecosystem. The Kulhudhuffushi mangrove system was the most biodiverse in the Maldives, hosting eight IUCN Red List species. Kulhudhuffushi mangroves had also provided a livelihood for over 400 people, predominantly women, and their families, who soaked coconut husks in the mangrove mud as part of a coir rope making industry sustained over many generations. Maldives report

The impacts of construction of Kulhudhufushi and two other new airports in the Maldives – on Funadhoo and Maafaru islands – are documented in an excellent booklet, Irreversible Damage, Destruction & Loss #SaveMaldives published by SaveMaldives a civic movement that has emerged in response to a government drive for new airports and tourism resorts. After destroying mangroves to make way for Kulhudhuffushi Airport MTCC was then awarded the contract to build facility’s  1.2 kilometre runway. Then MTCC’s new dredger moved southwards to Funadhoo island where it was deployed to reclaim land from the north west lagoon for another new airport. Upon completion of this operation MTCC was contracted to build Funadhoo Airport runway, apron and taxiway. Funadhoo is an environmentally sensitive area, sharing a reef with its twin island, Farukolhu, that includes extensive mangroves. Dredging and reclamation proceeded near to Farukolhu’s nesting grounds supporting several bird species and a bay that serves as a marine breeding site for sharks and rays.

Construction of Maafaru Airport is nearing completion and test flights are imminent. Lush vegetation has already been decimated. Ecosytems highlighted as at risk in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and now irreversibly removed, include 20,000 trees, mangroves, marshland, coral colonies and seagrass beds. The EIA flagged up the necessity of relocating mangroves but there is no evidence that any such mitigative measure has been implemented. Maafaru Airport is larger than Kulhudhufushi and Funadhoo airports. Its  2.2 kilometre runway is long enough to accommodate Boeing 737 planes with a regular terminal along with facilities for parking private jets and a hotel. Maafaru Airport is part of a US$60 million agreement with the Abu Dhabi Fund to develop ultra-luxurious tourism in Noonu atoll.

The Irreversible Damage, Destruction & Loss #SaveMaldives report draws attention to various aspects of regulatory failure which have allaowed airport projects without the obligatory safeguards. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is supposed to act as an independent authority but has been stripped of its powers to regulate tourism-related projects, effectively becoming a ‘rubber stamp’ legitimizing destructive infrastructure projects. A key EPA task is to assess, approve and monitor compliance with EIAs, but new airports and tourism projects resulting in irreversible damage to fragile ecosystems have been approved. New airports already under construction in Kulhudhuffushi, Funadhoo, Maafuru are just the beginning of an ecocidal aviation expansion frenzy. The Maldives government is planning a total of 20 new airports across the archipelago. Land reclamation also looms for a proliferation of new tourism resorts. The aviation and tourism drive expansion drive is obliterating white sand beaches and pristine coastal ecosystems, the very assets that are key to the the popularity of the Maldives as a tourist destination.

New airport threatens to swallow up Fainu island

The concept drawing for a new airport on Fainu island shows the airport taking up about two-thirds of the island land area with the runway extending along the entire southern coastline. The Maldives Independent calculated that 31 hectares of vegetation would be lost, including a dense jungle area and agricultural land. The airport plan also includes about 4 hectares of land reclamation. Land earmarked for a gated hotel is shown on the map below as an area adjacent to the airport and shaded in purple.

Fainu airport + hotel

A woman speaking anonymously to the Maldives Independent said that rumours of an airport on Fainu island had circulated since she was a child, but all of a sudden the airport agreement was signed, funding allocated and work about to commence, yet even the island council did not have information. Another woman said “If they take our land for all of that, we will be boxed into the paopulated ares of the island like an open jail”. Residents also stand to lose access to 2.18 kilometers of beautiful beach to the airport security zone and hotel. Additional developments, namely a medical facility, hangar, lounges and restaurants have been mentioned. Islanders opposing the airport are concerned that even more land might be taken for a second hotel.
#SaveFainu
Residents acted quickly to form a campaign opposing the airport, SaveFainu and a petition submitted to the Tourism Ministry, Universal Enterprises and Island Aviation was signed by 140 people, about half of the population of Fainu island. Universal Enterprises, one of the largest hospitality companies in the Maldives, is financing Fainu Airport through bulk purchase of advance sales of air tickets. Island Aviation, owner and operator of Maldivian, the largest carrier in the Maldives, has been awarded the US$8 million contract to develop the airport. The SaveFainu petition called for more transparency from the Tourism Ministry, proper consultation with islanders and an independent EIA.

Mohamed Waheed, a leading activist in the SaveFainu campaign said some residents did not sign the petition for fear of losing their jobs, but are worried that such a large amount of the island would be lost to the airport and the secrecy and lack of transparency regarding the project. People are worried that loss of farmland to the airport would mean the loss of farming livelihoods. Waheed said job opportunities at the airport would not match the incomes made by people working on farms and pointed out that a comparable airport on Kudahuvadhoo island only employs 29 people.

More land reclamation, more new airports

Land reclamation has already created space for a new airport on Muli island. On 11th July 2018 President Yameen pledged to develop an airport on Muli island and attended a ceremony marking completion of the land reclamation project. MTCC has been paving the way for an airport on Muli island for some time. A land reclamation agreement was signed in 2014 and reclamation of 40 hectares of land was reported as completed in May 2017. An aerial photo shows an ideal site for an airport runway already in place, a strip of reclaimed land running along almost the entire eastern shoreline of Muli island, encompassing the southern tip and extending along about a third of the western coast.

MTCC has also been contracted to reclaim land for a new airport in Hoarafushi in Haa Alif Atoll, the northernmost atoll in the Maldives. The project, anticipated to cost over US$4 million, will be funded by the state budget. MTCC has already started development of an airport on Maavarulu island, a project costing US$ 3.7 million funded by the state budget, with tarring of the 1,200 metre runway scheduled to commence by the end of July. Maarvarulu is an island on Gaafu Dhaalu Atoll, where a second new airport is to be built, on Faresmaathoda, an uninhabited island situated on the south of the atoll. Tourism developer ‘Champa’ Mohamed Moosa, gave a US$4 million loan to the government to develop the airport and a press conference at the beginning of June marked the signing of a US$2.5 million contract with Gulf Cobla, a UAE based dredging company, to begin land reclamation for the project.

Mohamed Moosa is chair of Kuredu Holdings, a major resort operator which has been awarded a contract to develop another new airport, on Madivaru island, in the tourism hotspot of Lhaviyani atoll, which will entail reclaiming three hectares of land from Madivaru lagoon. Kuredu Holdings is expected to develop a hotel to support Madivaru airport operations. More land reclamation, and yet another new airport, looms in Bileyfahi, where President Abdulla Yameen pledged to reclaim land and build a domestic airport, explaining that this additional facility, together with the new Funadhoo Airport, which is located just 40 kilometres away, will make Shaviyani atoll a tourism hub.

The necessity of the new airports, many of which are generously funded by the government, is highly questionable. The Maldives already has 12 airports and all three new airports in the #SaveMaldives report are being constructed even though an existing airport is easily accessible by speedboat, a journey of 45 minutes in the case of Funadhoo Airport, 40 minutes on the case of Maafuru and just 25 minutes away from Kulhudhuffushi Airport. In a similar vein, SaveFainu campaigners regard an airport on Fainu island to be unnecessary as an existing airport in Raa atoll, 26 kilometers away on Ifuru island, can be reached by speedboat in just 25 minutes.

Climate impacts from aviation expansion, land reclamation and loss of mangroves

The Maldives government continues its drive to build new airport projects even though the country is on the front line of the battle against climate change. Rising seas are lapping at the shores of many low-lying islands. The Irreversible Damage, Destruction & Loss #SaveMaldives report points out the inconsistency of the Maldives government on the international stage when in November 2017, Environment Minister, Thoriq Ibrahim, traveled to advocate for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) at the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS). A key issue for small islands is their vulnerability to rising seas caused by climate change. Yet the government driven and funded aviation expansion drive is a climate double whammy; with aviation expansion increasing greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft and land reclamation increasing vulnerability to climate change induced flooding from rising sea levels, severe storm surges and more intense rainfall due to removal of vegetation which serve as a buffer absorbing excess water.

Destruction of mangroves for new airports compounds the climate impacts, because these unique ecosystems play a unique role in carbon sequestration, absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere and storing in their biomass for long periods and laying down soil that acts as a carbon sink. The Maldives government pursues environmentally devastating airport projects in the face of widespread opposition from civil society, even though it is a recipient of large amounts of donor funds for climate change mitigation and resilience. International organizations and development partners such as UNDP Maldives have remained silent.

Tourism: Global civil society witnesses joint statement appeals for harm avoidance

Rose Bridger Tourism , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A group of CSOs (civil society organizations) have taken action to help raise awareness of and influence the United Nations tourism agenda. The United Nations has designated 2017 as the International Year of Sustainable Tourism for Development (IY2017) to promote tourism’s role in contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Civil society groups have long voiced concerns over tourism growth that, through its aviation dependency, is fossil fuel dependent, and is a key driver of land grabs displacing communities and destroying ecosystems. GAAM joined a number of CSOs in issuing a joint statement criticizing the current global tourism and development model. Entitled ‘Tourism, Urgent Appeal for Harm Avoidance’, the statement was issued on 22nd May, the International Day for Biodiversity which was marked this year on the theme of ‘sustainable tourism’. The statement was issued by: International Support Centre for Sustainable Tourism, Tourism Investigation and Monitoring Team (Tim-Team), Global Anti-Aerotropolis Movement (GAAM), Third World Network (TWN), Consumers Association of Penang, Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Friends of the Earth, Malaysia), and Tourism Advocacy and Action Forum (TAAF).

An article by Friends of the Earth International International Day for biological biodiversity: celebrate by protecting biodiversity, not promoting tourism critiques the UN Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) for using the International Day for Biodiversity to promote tourism and mentioning the need to reduce its negative impacts, but failing to recognize that many so-called ‘sustainable tourism’ projects, fail host communities by denying them revenue generation and self-determination. In the worst cases indigenous peoples are evicted to make way for resorts. FOE calls for tourism policies that protect ecosystems and the rights of local communities, calling for celebration of International Biodiversity Day by challenging the dominant tourism business model.

Aviation is one of the most rapidly growing sources of climate damaging greenhouse gas emissions and a press release from the Global Forest Coalition Aviation Emissions Under Scrutiny On Sustainable Tourism Day raises the issue of proposals to offset these emissions, which were discussed at last week’s climate talks in Bonn, Germany.  Instead of reducing its emissions the aviation industry seeks to offset them with monoculture tree plantations which are a threat to biodiversity and local communities. The plantations destroy natural ecosystems and the livelihoods of communities that depend on them.

Challenging tourism growth: the role of aviation and impacts on biodiversity

Rose Bridger Tourism , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tourism was on the agenda at the 13th Meeting of the Conference of Parties (COP13) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), held in Cancun, Mexico in December 2016. The draft Cancun Declaration recognizes that tourism, a major sector in the global economy, is dependent upon biodiverse ecosystems. A Third World Network (TWN) briefing paper, ‘Tourism at the tipping point: Governance for future generations’, prepared by Alison M. Johnston, Director of the International Support Centre for Sustainable Tourism, Canada, urges a precautionary approach to tourism growth, challenging the institutionalization of the industry as a ‘pre-approved enterprise’ which facilitates its expansion into remote areas, often damaging rather than conserving ecosystems and biodiversity. The paper highlights the role of aviation, the tourism industry’s dependence upon the petroleum industry, the impacts on indigenous peoples and considerations for future generations.

The paper was presented and discussed at a COP side-event entitled ‘Tourism and Biodiversity: Benefits and Hazards’ that was co-organized by the TWN, the Global Forest Coalition, the International Support Centre for Sustainable Tourism (ISCST) and the Tourism Investigation & Monitoring Team (tim-team). This input to the UN biodiversity conference, and other critical perspective on tourism, are particularly important in view of the United Nations designation of 2017 as the International Year of Sustainable Tourism for Development, aiming to support ‘a change in policies, business practices and consumer behavior towards a more sustainable tourism sector’.