The UN’s International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) Assembly met in early October to agree on measures to curb emissions from international aviation, a sector that had been left out of the Paris Agreement a year earlier.
From the perspective of our campaign to change the culture of flying in academia, I have to see the agreement as inadequate. The agreement is voluntary, relies too much on offsets in place of actual emission reductions, and gives too little attention to restraining aviation demand. The case against the agreement is summarized in the video below from FERN, an environmental organization, and in the vigorous Guardian column this week from George Monbiot.
Some environmental organizations are more optimistic about the agreement (see World Wildlife Fund Oct 10).
While readers may share one view or the other, I feel we should all agree on some principles of honest reporting about this agreement. Nobody…
View original post 324 more words